Biochemical Methods II

Chemistry and Biochemistry department

Stacie S Nakamoto

Biochemical Methods II

Chemistry and Biochemistry department

Stacie S Nakamoto

Add Review
from 16 users

Ratings

Bad
Overall 3.6
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 1.2
Easy
Heavy
Workload 1.6
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 3.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 2.6
Helpful
AD

Tags

There are no relevant tags for this professor.

Grades

Fall 2016
17.5%
14.6%
11.7%
8.8%
5.8%
2.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2016
24.0%
20.0%
16.0%
12.0%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2016
24.3%
20.2%
16.2%
12.1%
8.1%
4.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2015
22.2%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2015
31.3%
26.1%
20.9%
15.7%
10.4%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2015
19.8%
16.5%
13.2%
9.9%
6.6%
3.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2014
47.1%
39.2%
31.4%
23.5%
15.7%
7.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2014
25.3%
21.1%
16.8%
12.6%
8.4%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2014
25.0%
20.8%
16.7%
12.5%
8.3%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2013
21.3%
17.8%
14.2%
10.7%
7.1%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2013
29.5%
24.6%
19.7%
14.7%
9.8%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2013
25.6%
21.4%
17.1%
12.8%
8.5%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2012
26.0%
21.7%
17.3%
13.0%
8.7%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2010
22.0%
18.3%
14.7%
11.0%
7.3%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2009
28.3%
23.6%
18.9%
14.2%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Fall 2006
26.7%
22.2%
17.8%
13.3%
8.9%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2006
26.2%
21.8%
17.5%
13.1%
8.7%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD
AD
1 of 2

Reviews

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted Nov. 17, 2015 Grade Received: N/A

I am selling lab reports and exams that earned me an A. Contact me at [email protected] for more details.

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted June 27, 2015 Grade Received: N/A

Selling the Spring 2015 course reader/lab manual for $10.

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted May 22, 2015 Grade Received: N/A

this bitch not funny, she thinks she is though

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted June 7, 2014 Grade Received: N/A

Great and nice professor. Always willing to help you out. The material you learn will benefit you a lot of industry if that is your plan.

I have graded exams and reports for that class with relatively good scores and comments for guidance on the reports. $15 per report and corresponding exam. email me at [email protected]

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted June 8, 2013 Grade Received: N/A

she pretty good

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted April 3, 2013 Grade Received: N/A

Had Professor Nakamoto for chem 154 during winter 2013. As far as I know, she is the only professor who teaches this class, so there's no point in waiting for a different professor (until she leaves her position).

The class consists of three projects. On the first day, she tells you that this is a capstone course and that she will be treating you like adults, meaning she will not be making you learn by rote memorization. This means you will not be writing pre- and post-labs for this class. Yay, right?

Nay. Instead of pre- and post-labs, you have long papers to write at the end of every project. It’s also a double whammy to have an exam before the papers are due. And for some odd reason, the class is structured so that the assignments with the most point value are first so the last exam and paper are not worth very much. This may be good for some who learn quickly, but most students don’t know what to expect for the first midterm and paper yet they’re both worth the biggest chunks of the course.

Curve is very generous though: I thought I was going to get a B in the course, but ended with an A.

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted Feb. 4, 2013 Grade Received: N/A

***hey everyone
im taking chem 154 right now with nakamoto.
if you have any of his old midterms i will buy them from you or trade you for one you need.
if you are interested please email: [email protected]
Thank you

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted Nov. 4, 2010 Grade Received: N/A

I'm thinking about taking chem 154 next quarter. For those of people who have taken her, Can I buy the previous midterms from you guys. PLease contact me via [email protected] Thank you very much...

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted April 1, 2009 Grade Received: N/A

well, 154 is a 5unit course with 8hours of lab every week, so do expect a lot of work!! there are 2 fairly straight forward midterm, avg was like 75%. Lab reports were painful but i think they were wayyy easier than 153L. There is not weekly quiz and you don't have to write the protocols like u have to for 153L. in many ways, 154 is easier than 153L..

so abt the prof, you really don't have any other option for professor cause she's the only one teaching. nonetheless, i like her teaching style, very straight to the point and shes willing to explain stuff numerous times as long as u ask her. good prof overall and fun class - take it and u'll understand why

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted Feb. 9, 2009 Grade Received: N/A

dude, if u're taking this class, there is NO reason for you to read this. You're probably a biochem senior who HAS to take this class, and is dying to graduate. Whether Nakamoto is good or not at what she does, does it really matter? You still have to take this class, and it's not bad at all! Just get a good TA, find good group to work with, find previous midterms, and work hard!

1 of 2

Tags

There are no relevant tags for this professor.

ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.