Tyler arant is a very good lecturer, but he lowkey gatekeeps everything. Canvas had literally nothing on there, no notes, no topics, nothing. He just posted homework solution videos and a practice midterm and final which were pretty good but it was a bit annoying before the final when I was trying to study and his "final exam information" pdf just had the location of the final and a half-ass formula sheet that was missing like half of the formulas that you actually needed to know for the test.

I know for a fact this man is a gambler tho he dropping a vegas reference every week even hit us with the plinko gambling example to represent clt.

Homeworks were pretty chill, so were quizzes, tests were alright (midterm and final averaged around a 60%)

Does not provide solutions to HW after they were turned in and his TAs graded them after quizzes/exams had passed, so i was unsure if I was doing it correctly. I will say that the HW is similar to quizzes which sounds good but like i said, I was always unsure if what I was doing was correct on the HW since there was no solution manual and therefore I often applied incorrect methods on the quizzes which could've been avoided with a solution manual. He also grades on correctness to add to it. He can be the best professor in the world but this part of his teaching method kills it for me. Other than that, he seems like a nice dude and has organized lectures and all but the material is harder than it should be had he just provided solutions for HW like every other professor ever. would not take again even if he is the highest rated at UCLA for math for this sole reason.