I actually liked this class. The material wasn't difficult once you got the rules (literally learn and recognize the rules, that's all there is to it) and the prof/Tristen/tutors were all so helpful even though I only went to office hours once or twice. The other reviews had me a little scared, but it definitely was much easier than I anticipated. There was an exaggerated review on weekend office hours, but that was only for exam weeks and they were meant for students to reach out before the exams if needed. Tristen (the TA) was definitely the most helpful in getting me to understand quantified symbolizations, definitely go to discussion if you want to really do well.

The exams are truly limited in that there are only 15 or so questions on each. Half of the points went to derivations (where you know during the exam if you got them correct) so that was helpful. Symbolizations were the hardest, but as I mentioned before, all you really have to do is know the rules + little tricks that you pick up from others/Tristen along the way!

The class was pretty interesting! I would say it's pretty important to stay on top of lectures and new concepts since all new material builds on prior material. Levy also does not record his lectures, so it's pretty important to go to class.

Also, go to the tutor sessions! A lot of them have their own know-hows for how to solve problems.

This class is demanding, but honestly so rewarding and kind of fun when you finally understood the concepts. Professor Levy is so nice and willing to help. Honestly I think the key to doing well in this class are going to the drop in tutoring sessions, unsure if he’s still there but Nikolai? was so helpful. Keep up with the homework, I recommend splitting it into two days because it can be kind of draining. Overall, as long as you stay on top of homework you are well prepared for the exams. Lectures can be a little long but the example problems the professor shows sets you up to do the homework.

Lovely professor

Levy is a great and funny professor. His lectures are interesting and definitely keep you engaged, which is important for a morning class.

I found his material on LOGIC 2010 to be a little difficult at times. This led me to making this class P/NP, but many students found the material to be rather easy. I would have received a B if I stayed with a letter grade, but everyone's experience will vary.

Overall, it was a fun class and if you're pre-law and/or like philosophy, then go ahead and take this class!

I enjoyed this class. I took it as a pre-req for cognitive science and I would recommend it for other pre cog sci majors. I thought solving the problems was fun. There were about two homework assignments every week. Each assignment would have a few difficult problems, I would definitely recommend going to tutoring or office hours before spending too much time solving them on your own. They can be time-consuming if you don't know how to solve them but there are a lot of resources for students who need help. The professor clearly enjoys teaching and is really nice. His lectures are long but recorded if you need a break. He puts a lot of effort into his slides. The quizzes all together are 80% of the grade which is scary at first, but they are all open note and the professor gives practice exams beforehand. You will also probably have time to check your work depending on how fast you solve the problems. Try to do the derivations first because it tells you if those are correct. If you end up taking this class, definitely take notes on all the types of problems because they will most likely be similar on the tests. I'll admit this class may not be for everyone, but if you enjoy solving puzzles I would definitely recommend it. :)

Others here have said that this won't help for the LSAT, but it really does. It won't be immediately obvious because the content of homework or exams isn't directly applicable (you'll probably never do a truth table in real life), but if you want to get better at deciphering logical statements, this class will help.

Disclaimer: I am a south campus major and I know a lot of reviews on Levy are pretty split between north campus majors and south campus majors so this is just my experience.

Levy is one of nicest profs I've ever had at UCLA. He's like this kind grandpa and is always down to help. In terms of this course specifically, I enjoyed this course. We go over symbolizations (which are by far the hardest part of this course), truth tables (which are by far the easiest part of this course), derivations (which are kinda fun), and invalidities. This course is honestly a blend of an english comprehension course and a BASIC proof based course. (if you are a math major, its extremely elementary so don't get too scared of this, i.e. easier than geometry proofs in high school). The pacing of this course is pretty slow in my opinion but no complaints about that. The grading scheme is 20% homework (which is an easy 100% as long as you do it), 20% midterm 1, 20% midterm 2, and 40% final. I definitely underestimated the course at first. I got a 82/100 on midterm 1, 91/100 on midterm 2, and 193/200 on the final. Raw score, I was at a 93.2% so I was chilling for the A but I have no idea if there is a curve (but I think theres a slight one??? because my 82% was a B and 91% was an A instead of a B- and A-) So even if you don't do too hot on the first midterm, you can definitely still recover. I didn't really go to lectures, discussions nor office hours so I cannot talk about the TAs and the "tutors" but there are plenty of resources to clarify misconceptions. One big plus is that the TA/Prof grade really fast (less than one week turn around for midterm and final). Overall, I would definitely recommend this class who is interested in logic. Thanks Levy for a great quarter !

I really struggled in this class. B+ on midterm 1, B- on midterm 2, and an A on the final all to get an A- in the class. Levy was a fairly good teacher and the TA Kim was very helpful. However, I definitely spent a lot of time trying to teach myself the concepts. I would say if you are a math/STEM major, this class would probably come easier to you. If you are doing this as a philosophy requirement for the psych major, I would suggest another class. The pain this class caused me was not really worth it personally. So if you do decide to take the class, take it P/NP. One thing that also really rubbed me the wrong way was when we had class the day after the election at 9am and he suggested we “use this class as our therapy” it felt like a slap in the face really. Although the class was recorded, I personally went to every live lecture because I felt that it would’ve been impossible to sit through the recorded lecture and not just give up. Also if you do decide to take this class, READ THE BOOK!

I saw this class get a lot of criticism this quarter, but I don't want people to get discouraged from taking this class--I think a good portion of the class find it pretty straightforward. for me, it definitely wasn't an easy A; I got A/A-/A- on midterm 1 and 2 and final, respectively, and ended up with an A- despite having a 100 on the homework. but it was a very doable A. he doesn't really curve, and gives no extra credit, but does always give partial credit on exams so that helps a bit. sometimes the homework is really difficult so I'd advise joining the groupme because people are very helpful!! but otherwise, for me it was not insanely hard, and actually pretty fun/relaxing at times. it might have helped that I have a stem background...I guess the class material is very formulaic in a way? though also, having a strong grasp of the english language is useful too, because the homework and exams word things in a way that threaten to break your brain sometimes. basically, if you're scared about taking this class because other people said it was horrible, just keep in mind there's a good chance it's actually not that horrible. also, reading reviews from last year it seems he wasn't very accommodating, but it seems like he took that into consideration because now he has different test times for students in other timezones and etc. he does go very very very slow (like talks slow) so I watched all (recorded) lectures at 2x speed.