Sharon Traweek
Department of History
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Participation Matters
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
OPEN

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

Lecture List
Lecture 1
T/R 2:00 PM - 3:50 PM
AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
July 1, 2020

Professor Traweek was extremely clear about her expectations for our assignments and encouraged us to ask her clarifying questions. She was also happy to read over our work and give feedback! The lectures were more focused on themes than specific topics, and the readings could be long, but she really emphasized effort and improvement! 10 pages over a course of ten weeks (1 page of Analytical Reviews per week), no exams or papers.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 31, 2014

Lectures are unorganized and completely random - so much so that I attended every single lecture for 10 weeks, and I'm still not sure what the class was about.
She is incredibly nit-picky and petty. She cares about formatting of the papers over content.
She knows the students don't listen, so she gets defensive and accuses students of not listening when they ask questions even though they are only asking because everything she says is unclear.

Don't take her class. It's not worth any of the trouble.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
July 1, 2020

Professor Traweek was extremely clear about her expectations for our assignments and encouraged us to ask her clarifying questions. She was also happy to read over our work and give feedback! The lectures were more focused on themes than specific topics, and the readings could be long, but she really emphasized effort and improvement! 10 pages over a course of ten weeks (1 page of Analytical Reviews per week), no exams or papers.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 31, 2014

Lectures are unorganized and completely random - so much so that I attended every single lecture for 10 weeks, and I'm still not sure what the class was about.
She is incredibly nit-picky and petty. She cares about formatting of the papers over content.
She knows the students don't listen, so she gets defensive and accuses students of not listening when they ask questions even though they are only asking because everything she says is unclear.

Don't take her class. It's not worth any of the trouble.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
ADS