Scott H Chandler
Department of Neuroscience
AD
4.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 4.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

40.0%
33.3%
26.7%
20.0%
13.3%
6.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

48.1%
40.1%
32.1%
24.1%
16.0%
8.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

54.5%
45.5%
36.4%
27.3%
18.2%
9.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.0%
23.3%
18.7%
14.0%
9.3%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.5%
47.1%
37.7%
28.3%
18.8%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

47.1%
39.2%
31.4%
23.5%
15.7%
7.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.7%
29.8%
23.8%
17.9%
11.9%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.6%
28.8%
23.1%
17.3%
11.5%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

53.8%
44.9%
35.9%
26.9%
17.9%
9.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

42.9%
35.7%
28.6%
21.4%
14.3%
7.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
March 8, 2024

Professor Chandler really likes to challenge his students to think critically, which is very helpful for our learning. He has a very eccentric, "tough love" way of teaching and interacting with students, but I've grown to appreciate it. This is a very difficult class to succeed in on your own, so going to his office hours and having a study group were essential to my success, as he predicted that it would be. My interest in the course content was pretty low coming in, but Chandler somehow made CPGs exciting to learn about and to think about on my own. Also his grading was very generous and I appreciated that.

My only real critique has to do with Chandler's lecture slides. While it was nice to have all the slides needed for a section at once, it would have been helpful had he updated the slides and rearranged them before the class began, or at least before each lecture. Sometimes it was hard to follow along without having his same slide. And then there's his drawings. Having taken NEUROSC m101A with him, I already knew how to read his cell diagrams, but I do think that are probably visually clearer ways to present a lot of the course's information. The shorthand is useful to emulate though when I am working on my own.

All in all, Chandler has become one of my favorite professors of my whole undergraduate experience this quarter. He may not be able to pronounce half the class's names, but he's very sweet and has a good sense of humor haha. Thanks for everything, Dr. Chandler!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
March 8, 2024

Professor Chandler really likes to challenge his students to think critically, which is very helpful for our learning. He has a very eccentric, "tough love" way of teaching and interacting with students, but I've grown to appreciate it. This is a very difficult class to succeed in on your own, so going to his office hours and having a study group were essential to my success, as he predicted that it would be. My interest in the course content was pretty low coming in, but Chandler somehow made CPGs exciting to learn about and to think about on my own. Also his grading was very generous and I appreciated that.

My only real critique has to do with Chandler's lecture slides. While it was nice to have all the slides needed for a section at once, it would have been helpful had he updated the slides and rearranged them before the class began, or at least before each lecture. Sometimes it was hard to follow along without having his same slide. And then there's his drawings. Having taken NEUROSC m101A with him, I already knew how to read his cell diagrams, but I do think that are probably visually clearer ways to present a lot of the course's information. The shorthand is useful to emulate though when I am working on my own.

All in all, Chandler has become one of my favorite professors of my whole undergraduate experience this quarter. He may not be able to pronounce half the class's names, but he's very sweet and has a good sense of humor haha. Thanks for everything, Dr. Chandler!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 4.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!