Sanjay Subrahmanyam
Department of History
AD
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 20 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

55.3%
46.1%
36.9%
27.7%
18.4%
9.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

39.2%
32.7%
26.1%
19.6%
13.1%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

59.5%
49.5%
39.6%
29.7%
19.8%
9.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.6%
23.0%
18.4%
13.8%
9.2%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

43.9%
36.6%
29.3%
22.0%
14.6%
7.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (13)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 4, 2011

Professor himself is very knowledgeable and a pretty good lecturer. However, I found the class to be very boring and way too much reading for a GE class. The 2 hour discussions were also very hard to get through. We had to turn in a 2 page paper every week which required us to do the dry/boring readings and write about them; this got to be a big hassle. Overall I would not recommend taking this class for a GE when there are plenty of more interesting ones out there that cover the same requirement.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 19, 2009

Professor Subrahmanyam is unbelievably knowledgeable and really will answer any question. He does a pretty good job going over the entire history of India and gives a well-rounded unbiased opinion. The discussion is kind of hard to bear since it's two hours long, but that is the only negative I experienced in the class. The Professor himself is the best I've had for a GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 8, 2009

Overall a pretty good professor. His lectures are interesting and decently intertaining. The Mid-term is 2 Five Page take home essays so really not too bad. Most of the class was South Asian which was pretty cool. I am not and although some of the class had kind of a head start it didn't matter. He is a nice guy who whill take all questions even if they are ridiculous. Good amount of reading but I didn't do it all and I was fine. Really a genius who knows his stuff. I recommend this class even if you have a little bit of interest in Indian History.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 4, 2011

Professor himself is very knowledgeable and a pretty good lecturer. However, I found the class to be very boring and way too much reading for a GE class. The 2 hour discussions were also very hard to get through. We had to turn in a 2 page paper every week which required us to do the dry/boring readings and write about them; this got to be a big hassle. Overall I would not recommend taking this class for a GE when there are plenty of more interesting ones out there that cover the same requirement.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 19, 2009

Professor Subrahmanyam is unbelievably knowledgeable and really will answer any question. He does a pretty good job going over the entire history of India and gives a well-rounded unbiased opinion. The discussion is kind of hard to bear since it's two hours long, but that is the only negative I experienced in the class. The Professor himself is the best I've had for a GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 8, 2009

Overall a pretty good professor. His lectures are interesting and decently intertaining. The Mid-term is 2 Five Page take home essays so really not too bad. Most of the class was South Asian which was pretty cool. I am not and although some of the class had kind of a head start it didn't matter. He is a nice guy who whill take all questions even if they are ridiculous. Good amount of reading but I didn't do it all and I was fine. Really a genius who knows his stuff. I recommend this class even if you have a little bit of interest in Indian History.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 20 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!