Richard R Muntz
Department of Computer Science
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
17.0%
14.2%
11.3%
8.5%
5.7%
2.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.2%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 5, 2010

Prof. Muntz is one guy who's teaching you should avoid at all costs. His lectures are bad in three ways: first, he gets confused frequently while explaining the topic, which sends every student's already slim hopes of understanding anything down the drain. Next, his presentation slides.. They are very cryptic and unorganized (and ungodly looking). Third, he has bad writing (though he admits it) and uses some kinky notation to explain advanced statistical concepts - and the notation is DIFFERENT FROM ONE ON SLIDES AND FROM ONE IN THE TEXTBOOK(s)!
Overall, I deeply regret taking Muntz for 112. Even though the course is statistics-based and I did extremely well in STATS 110A, I had to drop to avoid getting an "F" in that class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 5, 2010

Prof. Muntz is one guy who's teaching you should avoid at all costs. His lectures are bad in three ways: first, he gets confused frequently while explaining the topic, which sends every student's already slim hopes of understanding anything down the drain. Next, his presentation slides.. They are very cryptic and unorganized (and ungodly looking). Third, he has bad writing (though he admits it) and uses some kinky notation to explain advanced statistical concepts - and the notation is DIFFERENT FROM ONE ON SLIDES AND FROM ONE IN THE TEXTBOOK(s)!
Overall, I deeply regret taking Muntz for 112. Even though the course is statistics-based and I did extremely well in STATS 110A, I had to drop to avoid getting an "F" in that class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!