Pamela Hieronymi
Department of Philosophy
AD
2.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2019

I felt obligated to give a review since most of hers seem to be from 10+ years ago. Professor Hieronymi was great, especially because I'm a visual learner. She explains things clearly and laid out an entire curriculum with readings that fit together—it felt like I was taking a course at a small LAC. She also was extremely helpful in office hours, and even in class she made a point to remember everyone's names.

Philosophy's hard guys. The material is challenging, but she did a great job as professor for this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 14, 2002

This class was extremely boring and difficult. Her lectures were ineffective and the reading was hard to grasp. I had to attend her office hours to help clarify the information she gave us in class. Although I am sure she is a brilliant person, she cannot teach. Hopefully in time she will get better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2019

I felt obligated to give a review since most of hers seem to be from 10+ years ago. Professor Hieronymi was great, especially because I'm a visual learner. She explains things clearly and laid out an entire curriculum with readings that fit together—it felt like I was taking a course at a small LAC. She also was extremely helpful in office hours, and even in class she made a point to remember everyone's names.

Philosophy's hard guys. The material is challenging, but she did a great job as professor for this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 14, 2002

This class was extremely boring and difficult. Her lectures were ineffective and the reading was hard to grasp. I had to attend her office hours to help clarify the information she gave us in class. Although I am sure she is a brilliant person, she cannot teach. Hopefully in time she will get better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!