Michael Lindstrom
Department of Program in Computing
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 41 Users
Easiness 1.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
35.6%
29.7%
23.7%
17.8%
11.9%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

37.7%
31.4%
25.1%
18.9%
12.6%
6.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.9%
26.6%
21.2%
15.9%
10.6%
5.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.0%
16.7%
13.3%
10.0%
6.7%
3.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.6%
17.2%
13.7%
10.3%
6.9%
3.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

16.7%
13.9%
11.1%
8.3%
5.6%
2.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

16.4%
13.7%
10.9%
8.2%
5.5%
2.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (33)

4 of 4
4 of 4
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2020
Grade: A-
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Dec. 28, 2020

This class was not it. I had experience in C++ before and still found the class miserable. A 95 is required for an A, so not great for the GPA, but I do believe the lower brackets might curve nicer.
There's a midterm and a final worth like 5% of your grade, 24 hours to complete, and usually taken from the end of the slides.
The older reviews are correct, the homework takes forever to complete(~10-15 hours/week according to a poll of class). If you want to succeed you need to start assignments early, use clues from TA's to start, and attend lots of office hours.
Also do not plagiarize! He's crazy about honor and cheating and will ruin your academic life.
Overall, you can get an ok grade if you put most of your time into it, but it's likely the other professors are easier for 10A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: C
May 15, 2020

TLDR: Do not take this class unless you want to have a breakdown in Boelter at least once a week. If you have to like I did at least do NOT take it with Mike Lindstrom. This class is a special kind of hell.

The class consists of one homework each week, a midterm, and a final. The homework seems easy the first couple weeks but do NOT underestimate the learning curve come around week 4/5. Make sure to get full points on the first couple of homeworks and if you get points off clarify why and try to get points back. I got a 5/20 on one homework because I forgot to change the name of the header file in my code and it technically didn't compile. 2 letters cost me 75% of that homework so be very careful with them. Go to office hours, my TA was Sam and she was super patient and helpful when I had questions. If you still need help on top of that there are fraternity chapters that offer free tutoring. There are three different chapters in Boelter and Boelter Hall that can help you, go there and say you need help with C++ and there's usually someone there that knows enough to help get you through the homework. The midterm and final are ridiculously hard. The average for the midterm was around 50% and the average for the final was 39%. You only have 50 minutes for the midterm which is multiple multiple-choice, code correcting, and code writing. On top of that Mike grades ridiculously harshly and with no remorse. People who submitted a re-grade for their midterm later hoping to get points back on a question usually lost points. The final turned out to be online for us considering the early end of the winter quarter. Although the exam was 24 hours online, open note, and open web the average was still only 39%. I submitted my exam and got an exam about an hour after it was due that my exam was somehow in a format that couldn't be opened by my TA. I quickly emailed her my exam again asking why the first submission wasn't working and she couldn't tell me why which is weird considering that was the same format I submitted my homework. Although, the copy I emailed my TA worked and I spent hours on the exam Mike gave me a 0 because the first copy I submitted wasn't working and the second one was technically late. Literally less than an hour late and only because the first copy wasn't opening right for a reason no one could explain. Mike refused to accept my exam even though I don't know why he thinks I would go through all that just to cheat an extra 50 minutes on a 24-hour exam. Mike doesn't care about helping the students who don't have prior experience or a knack for coding. His whole class is structured to weed out the very best and praise them, while not bothering with those struggling. It is ridiculous for an introductory class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 31, 2016

Michael is a good guy in teaching. He will give his help when you come across difficulties and he responds to emails very quickly. However, he sometimes make some definitions unclear, which he tries to make the explanations entertaining but only ends up being more confusing. the class is bruincasted but the quality of the video is not good at all. Michael will give you his very tough grading scale in his syllabus which might scare the heck out of you but he will eventually curve the grade such that 25% of the students will receive an A range. I earned a overall 91% which results in a final grade of A; if he stick firmly to his grading system, such score will only give me a B+.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Fall 2020
Grade: A-
Dec. 28, 2020

This class was not it. I had experience in C++ before and still found the class miserable. A 95 is required for an A, so not great for the GPA, but I do believe the lower brackets might curve nicer.
There's a midterm and a final worth like 5% of your grade, 24 hours to complete, and usually taken from the end of the slides.
The older reviews are correct, the homework takes forever to complete(~10-15 hours/week according to a poll of class). If you want to succeed you need to start assignments early, use clues from TA's to start, and attend lots of office hours.
Also do not plagiarize! He's crazy about honor and cheating and will ruin your academic life.
Overall, you can get an ok grade if you put most of your time into it, but it's likely the other professors are easier for 10A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: C
May 15, 2020

TLDR: Do not take this class unless you want to have a breakdown in Boelter at least once a week. If you have to like I did at least do NOT take it with Mike Lindstrom. This class is a special kind of hell.

The class consists of one homework each week, a midterm, and a final. The homework seems easy the first couple weeks but do NOT underestimate the learning curve come around week 4/5. Make sure to get full points on the first couple of homeworks and if you get points off clarify why and try to get points back. I got a 5/20 on one homework because I forgot to change the name of the header file in my code and it technically didn't compile. 2 letters cost me 75% of that homework so be very careful with them. Go to office hours, my TA was Sam and she was super patient and helpful when I had questions. If you still need help on top of that there are fraternity chapters that offer free tutoring. There are three different chapters in Boelter and Boelter Hall that can help you, go there and say you need help with C++ and there's usually someone there that knows enough to help get you through the homework. The midterm and final are ridiculously hard. The average for the midterm was around 50% and the average for the final was 39%. You only have 50 minutes for the midterm which is multiple multiple-choice, code correcting, and code writing. On top of that Mike grades ridiculously harshly and with no remorse. People who submitted a re-grade for their midterm later hoping to get points back on a question usually lost points. The final turned out to be online for us considering the early end of the winter quarter. Although the exam was 24 hours online, open note, and open web the average was still only 39%. I submitted my exam and got an exam about an hour after it was due that my exam was somehow in a format that couldn't be opened by my TA. I quickly emailed her my exam again asking why the first submission wasn't working and she couldn't tell me why which is weird considering that was the same format I submitted my homework. Although, the copy I emailed my TA worked and I spent hours on the exam Mike gave me a 0 because the first copy I submitted wasn't working and the second one was technically late. Literally less than an hour late and only because the first copy wasn't opening right for a reason no one could explain. Mike refused to accept my exam even though I don't know why he thinks I would go through all that just to cheat an extra 50 minutes on a 24-hour exam. Mike doesn't care about helping the students who don't have prior experience or a knack for coding. His whole class is structured to weed out the very best and praise them, while not bothering with those struggling. It is ridiculous for an introductory class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 31, 2016

Michael is a good guy in teaching. He will give his help when you come across difficulties and he responds to emails very quickly. However, he sometimes make some definitions unclear, which he tries to make the explanations entertaining but only ends up being more confusing. the class is bruincasted but the quality of the video is not good at all. Michael will give you his very tough grading scale in his syllabus which might scare the heck out of you but he will eventually curve the grade such that 25% of the students will receive an A range. I earned a overall 91% which results in a final grade of A; if he stick firmly to his grading system, such score will only give me a B+.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
4 of 4
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 41 Users
Easiness 1.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!