The 170E taught by the vice undergrad dept chair is definitely a unique experience to me. He skipped some material such as conditional pdf and expectations and said this will not cause any problem when we take 170S. He is a nice instructor who gave fair midterms and hard final(26-page long), and we indeed learn stuff from him. Unfortunately he does not teach the sequel. Not only I but also many of my friends began to miss him after finding those who actually give lectures for the sequel of 170E did a way less fantastic job than him.

For 266A, professor Roper is a great teacher and eager to help students, and he is generally clear on courses materials. He can be occasional late in class, but I find that understandable since he can be occupied by his daughter at times. The only con is that he seems never prepare for classes, and can sometimes confuse himself in some proofs (also higher possibility of typos in notes). The tests are fair for a graduate course, and I believe he curved a lot to give out more A’s.

Selling the book for the Math 3A class along with the solutions manual. The book is by Neuhauser 3rd edition. Text me at ********** if you wish to purchase.

One of the Best Professor I had at Math Department :)
GOAT!!

Marcus gave clear lectures, and his midterm is fair. Sometimes he requires students to develop more profound understanding in some topics, which was reflected in the final that frustrated a great number of students. Overall 4/5.

I thought Professor Roper was great. The only complaint I have is that a lot of the homework was based on Microsoft Excel/Google Docs, but that stuff never showed up on exams, so it was kind of a waste of time to do on the homework. He's actually pretty funny for a math professor and he always admits humbly when he's wrong (which isn't often).
Homework=20% (on the best 80% of assignments)
Midterms are 20% each
Final=40%
Your final exam score replaces one or both of your midterm scores if it's better, depending on whatever makes your grade the best.
I paid attention very little at the end of the course and I got an A.

This was my first math class at UCLA so feel free to take this with a grain of salt.

I skipped 3A but didn't take AP Calc BC so I was worried about falling behind the other students; thankfully, Professor Roper is a really nice guy. It's obvious that he really cares about his students and he's always happy to answer questions or try to reexplain concepts. He's always a jolly British dude with a great sense of humor.

However, his teaching style can be a real hit or a miss. For someone like myself, I enjoy having lots of examples to hammer down the concepts and formulas - so I despised going to lectures because Roper literally spends the time going on about concepts and really abstract (to most students at least...) examples that no one really followed. For someone who's very good at math or was taught in this style, Roper's class should be nothing out of the ordinary. Yet for students who're not that strong in math, going to lectures is a big waste of time when you can just try to teach yourself via the book. It also doesn't help that even Roper states, after spending 50 mins at the board, that a lot of the stuff he talks about isn't related and/or necessary for the class...

Grade consisted of homework assignments, discussion quizzes, two midterms and a final. Thankfully, he had a system where he compared each midterm to how you did on the final and picked the best score out of the two. Meaning that if you ace the midterms then you can literally bomb the final.

Worst part of the class were the additional questions - trust me, it starts off easy but later the questions become horrible, horrible things that unfortunately make up around 30% of all the tests.

Overall, this class IS doable as long as you spend the time rigorously doing the homework assignments, self-teaching yourself with the book, and attending the office hours. Plus, your TA can be an immense help as long as you make an effort to ask questions; mine was Michael!

I had Prof. Roper for Math 32A Winter 2017. Overall, the class was okay. Prof. Roper is decent lecturer, although it could be difficult to follow sometimes. He is really concerned about the well-being of his students, but still, the material (or the way he presents the material) is pretty difficult to understand. He doesn't give a lot of examples, so the homework problems (which he writes) can be difficult. His office hours can get pretty packed because again, the lectures are not always crystal clear. I think Prof. Roper should really describe how things work geometrically, make things simpler, etc. instead of proving formulas; this way his lectures would be clearer. We had one midterm and a final, which is pretty reasonable - not too difficult and not too easy either. Final can replace midterm score, if higher. It's a tough class, mostly because of not-too-clear lectures, but you'll be fine as long as you keep track of the material.

Office hours are important. Nice professor

I skipped 3A with my calc AB ap test and this class was very easy for me. I skipped every discussion after the first two and probably could've skipped the first 2 weeks of lecture. In discussion the TA just goes over practice problems of what we already learned in class. Roper already does a few problems though, plus you do more in the homework. The only challenging part of the class was the homework because the question difficulty would be a lot harder than stuff shown in class. You can ask for help on piazza though so it's not too bad. Thankfully, the test questions are more similar to problems done in class in difficulty. That being said, I saw a lot of people being confused and I could see why. The way Roper lectured was not the most efficient way in my opinion. He spoke and wrote on the board in language similar to a textbook.