Professor

Joseph Esdin

AD
4.1
Overall Ratings
Based on 614 Users
Easiness 3.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 4.1 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (614)

27 of 47
27 of 47
Add your review...
April 15, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A

The content is interesting and the professor gives clear lectures. If you read the course reader, lecture is not necessary to attend, however he does keep a sign in sheet. The syllabus splits up the grading into participation, discussion. quizzes, a midterm, final, and a project. The project consist of a large part of the grade and is not very difficult. I have heard mixed reviews on the midterm difficulty level, because there is a lot of material to memorize in the course reader in preparation. Overall I would definitely recommend this class and its a pretty easy A.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
April 20, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A

This class was so interesting, all he cares about is for you to remember a few ideas for your own health. There is one project that assesses your diet and physical activity, but everything is mapped out for you, and almost everyone gets a good grade on it.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 13, 2016
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: N/A

I've heard a lot of good things about this class, and I also needed the GE requirement fulfillment so why not.

First off, this is class is not as easy as it seems. It was already difficult because it was a 9am class. Attendance is required, unless you have someone to sign you in. Lectures are not as interesting as many says. It's literally him throwing information at us and expects us to understand everything. He doesn't stop because obviously there is a lot to cover. I didn't learn much in lectures and I sure as hell did not learn much from the readings. The readings are purely information (very long and detailed). The tests are basically random facts you should know from the readings, but if the readings are long, what are you supposed to know right? Exactly. It is purely memorization.

Lab: the TA has a heavy accent so it is difficult to follow. He talks fast and does not really stop. He does try to get people to ask questions, but everyone is confused about what he was talking about.

Overall, the class is basically the professor and TA throwing information at you and expects you to know it well. There may be perks in the class, but it doesn't make up for the fact that I didn't learn much from it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 15, 2016
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: B

Holy crap this class was hard.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 18, 2016
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A

I have heard so many good things about this class, some saying it is the "best and easiest GE you'll ever take." I think this class is extremely overrated.

"Easy A" is not the words to describe this class. If you put a lot of effort into this class and really do the work, then yes, this class is manageable. But don't think about taking this course as an easy A that will require minimal work. You won't do well.

He takes participation, has a workbook, project, discussion labs, two lecture quizzes, and three lab quizzes. And there are two exams.

The workbook and project are not hard, just time consuming. The discussion labs are easy, but the discussion quizzes are more difficult than you think. But he ended up giving everyone full points for everything related to discussion section, as long as you attended. These aren't the things that make the course difficult.

The exams are annoying. Literally every word in the course reader is considered "fair game" on the exam, and he'll put some of the most obscure questions that you either know or you don't. They'll be one small random fact from the entire chapter. You simply have to know everything. It is really annoying, and there is no way to really guess or just figure it out when you get to the test, because it is very very specific. You either know it or you don't. During lecture, he just spits out information, and you're expected to know it.

I got an A because I memorized everything like crazy in a short amount of time. If you read and MEMORIZE the chapters as you go through the quarter as he assigns it, you'll be fine. But don't do what I did. Its about 15-20 pages a week, which isn't too bad.

The class is not "easy." If you put in the work, its easy, but don't expect to be able to skim through the material, zone out through lecture, but still pull out an A no problem. You literally have to memorize all the information he gives you, and it's not as easy as it seems.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 20, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+

Materials
None!

Grading
Midterm 1 100
Midterm 2 100
Final 180
Quizzes 40
Discussion 10
There was a slight curve in our favor. I got a B+ with an 84.4% total. According to the syllabus, the rough distribution is as follows:
20% A
20% B
40% C
10-20% D

Lectures
Dr. Friscia's lectures were audiocasted, but Dr. Esdin's weren't. Everything tested was from the lectures. Friscia's lectures were boring, but he got the job done. Esdin, however, was a god. I loved listening to him, since the way he organized his lectures was impeccable. Each lecture felt like a narrative. Not only that, but he gave many examples to make this biology relevant to us. You could tell that he was truly an expert and lover of biology. Re-listening to his lectures before an exam did wonders for sorting out all of the information in my brain.

Discussion
We had four papers to read throughout the quarter and were tested on them on even weeks. While the articles constituted light reading, I suggest taking them seriously because the quizzes were tough. They were a mixture of fill-in-the-blank, true/false, and multiple-choice. Since they were written by TAs, who have little experience writing questions, they were tougher than they needed to be. For example, there was a fill-in-the-blank where we had to write the scientific name of some drug. I got a 30/40, and I feel like this was the difference between my B+ and an A- (assuming 85% was the A- cutoff).

Exams
These were tough. A bunch of multiple-choice followed by some short responses. Friscia's questions were easier than Esdin's, so for him, it was more a matter of organizing the information. Esdin's questions were tough because of the all the details that could confuse you in the multiple-choice. His short answers were kind of regurgitations of what he said in lectures, such as list the steps in this process. One of them was missed by almost everyone, which asked for an application of one little thing that he mentioned during lecture.
The medians were:
Midterm 1 82
Midterm 2 74.6
Final 138 (77%)

Tips
- Although Friscia's lectures were audiocasted, you should still attend lecture because he wrote notes on the projector that he wouldn't say out loud. One of the diagrams he made appeared on the exam.
- Friscia provided chapter review worksheets after every lecture. Some of the questions on them appeared on the exams.
- Record Esdin's lectures and marathon them before the exams.

tl;dr I regard Dr. Esdin highly and would consider it a loss in your UCLA career if you didn't take him. Dr. Friscia was fair and somewhat easy. Unfortunately, the exams are tough and there is nothing that you can do about it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 21, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A

He was a great professor. Very engaging and passionate about the topic. His tests were easyish if you study. Lots of memorization needed.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 22, 2016
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A

SELLING: the NEWEST edition (2015 Fall) of coursereader- great condition with some highlighting
completed workbook

iprofile account (which expires on September 2016 so you can resell it after you finish the class)

email me : *************

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Aug. 9, 2016
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: A

Do whatever you can to take LS 2 with Esdin. He is the most effective professor I have had at ucla, I will not forget the material. He also bumped up my grade from A- to A. The tests are all real life application problems which get tricky but he gives you everything you need to be prepared. And take it over summer if you can because he is much more lenient. He loves teaching and tries very hard to make sure his students understand everything.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Aug. 18, 2016
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: A

Oh Esdin, the man I love and hate. Took LS 2 with him one year ago and ended up with C-, seriously the hardest class and the worst grade I have ever had. And here I am, sitting in his LS2 class again and surprised about how much his lecturing styles has changed. A decent lecturer as always, he now applies a strategy called "flipped classroom" and asks us to watch lecture videos at home. During normal lectures he goes over those concepts by having us discuss with neighbors and answer clicker questions. He no longer requires us to memorize all the info on slides (he even provides figures from slides on exams!) but encourages us to understand those concepts from real-life applications. His exams are way easier than those I took last year, the average of midterm last year was 70% and now it is 84%. And he even gives out extra credits if you give any feedback on his video lectures (which bumped my grade from A- to A).
TL;DR: Take Esdin for LS2, especially during summer sessions lol.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
April 15, 2016

The content is interesting and the professor gives clear lectures. If you read the course reader, lecture is not necessary to attend, however he does keep a sign in sheet. The syllabus splits up the grading into participation, discussion. quizzes, a midterm, final, and a project. The project consist of a large part of the grade and is not very difficult. I have heard mixed reviews on the midterm difficulty level, because there is a lot of material to memorize in the course reader in preparation. Overall I would definitely recommend this class and its a pretty easy A.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A
April 20, 2016

This class was so interesting, all he cares about is for you to remember a few ideas for your own health. There is one project that assesses your diet and physical activity, but everything is mapped out for you, and almost everyone gets a good grade on it.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: N/A
June 13, 2016

I've heard a lot of good things about this class, and I also needed the GE requirement fulfillment so why not.

First off, this is class is not as easy as it seems. It was already difficult because it was a 9am class. Attendance is required, unless you have someone to sign you in. Lectures are not as interesting as many says. It's literally him throwing information at us and expects us to understand everything. He doesn't stop because obviously there is a lot to cover. I didn't learn much in lectures and I sure as hell did not learn much from the readings. The readings are purely information (very long and detailed). The tests are basically random facts you should know from the readings, but if the readings are long, what are you supposed to know right? Exactly. It is purely memorization.

Lab: the TA has a heavy accent so it is difficult to follow. He talks fast and does not really stop. He does try to get people to ask questions, but everyone is confused about what he was talking about.

Overall, the class is basically the professor and TA throwing information at you and expects you to know it well. There may be perks in the class, but it doesn't make up for the fact that I didn't learn much from it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
LIFESCI 2
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: B
June 15, 2016

Holy crap this class was hard.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 18, 2016

I have heard so many good things about this class, some saying it is the "best and easiest GE you'll ever take." I think this class is extremely overrated.

"Easy A" is not the words to describe this class. If you put a lot of effort into this class and really do the work, then yes, this class is manageable. But don't think about taking this course as an easy A that will require minimal work. You won't do well.

He takes participation, has a workbook, project, discussion labs, two lecture quizzes, and three lab quizzes. And there are two exams.

The workbook and project are not hard, just time consuming. The discussion labs are easy, but the discussion quizzes are more difficult than you think. But he ended up giving everyone full points for everything related to discussion section, as long as you attended. These aren't the things that make the course difficult.

The exams are annoying. Literally every word in the course reader is considered "fair game" on the exam, and he'll put some of the most obscure questions that you either know or you don't. They'll be one small random fact from the entire chapter. You simply have to know everything. It is really annoying, and there is no way to really guess or just figure it out when you get to the test, because it is very very specific. You either know it or you don't. During lecture, he just spits out information, and you're expected to know it.

I got an A because I memorized everything like crazy in a short amount of time. If you read and MEMORIZE the chapters as you go through the quarter as he assigns it, you'll be fine. But don't do what I did. Its about 15-20 pages a week, which isn't too bad.

The class is not "easy." If you put in the work, its easy, but don't expect to be able to skim through the material, zone out through lecture, but still pull out an A no problem. You literally have to memorize all the information he gives you, and it's not as easy as it seems.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
LIFESCI 2
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+
June 20, 2016

Materials
None!

Grading
Midterm 1 100
Midterm 2 100
Final 180
Quizzes 40
Discussion 10
There was a slight curve in our favor. I got a B+ with an 84.4% total. According to the syllabus, the rough distribution is as follows:
20% A
20% B
40% C
10-20% D

Lectures
Dr. Friscia's lectures were audiocasted, but Dr. Esdin's weren't. Everything tested was from the lectures. Friscia's lectures were boring, but he got the job done. Esdin, however, was a god. I loved listening to him, since the way he organized his lectures was impeccable. Each lecture felt like a narrative. Not only that, but he gave many examples to make this biology relevant to us. You could tell that he was truly an expert and lover of biology. Re-listening to his lectures before an exam did wonders for sorting out all of the information in my brain.

Discussion
We had four papers to read throughout the quarter and were tested on them on even weeks. While the articles constituted light reading, I suggest taking them seriously because the quizzes were tough. They were a mixture of fill-in-the-blank, true/false, and multiple-choice. Since they were written by TAs, who have little experience writing questions, they were tougher than they needed to be. For example, there was a fill-in-the-blank where we had to write the scientific name of some drug. I got a 30/40, and I feel like this was the difference between my B+ and an A- (assuming 85% was the A- cutoff).

Exams
These were tough. A bunch of multiple-choice followed by some short responses. Friscia's questions were easier than Esdin's, so for him, it was more a matter of organizing the information. Esdin's questions were tough because of the all the details that could confuse you in the multiple-choice. His short answers were kind of regurgitations of what he said in lectures, such as list the steps in this process. One of them was missed by almost everyone, which asked for an application of one little thing that he mentioned during lecture.
The medians were:
Midterm 1 82
Midterm 2 74.6
Final 138 (77%)

Tips
- Although Friscia's lectures were audiocasted, you should still attend lecture because he wrote notes on the projector that he wouldn't say out loud. One of the diagrams he made appeared on the exam.
- Friscia provided chapter review worksheets after every lecture. Some of the questions on them appeared on the exams.
- Record Esdin's lectures and marathon them before the exams.

tl;dr I regard Dr. Esdin highly and would consider it a loss in your UCLA career if you didn't take him. Dr. Friscia was fair and somewhat easy. Unfortunately, the exams are tough and there is nothing that you can do about it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
June 21, 2016

He was a great professor. Very engaging and passionate about the topic. His tests were easyish if you study. Lots of memorization needed.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSCI 5
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 22, 2016

SELLING: the NEWEST edition (2015 Fall) of coursereader- great condition with some highlighting
completed workbook

iprofile account (which expires on September 2016 so you can resell it after you finish the class)

email me : *************

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
LIFESCI 2
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: A
Aug. 9, 2016

Do whatever you can to take LS 2 with Esdin. He is the most effective professor I have had at ucla, I will not forget the material. He also bumped up my grade from A- to A. The tests are all real life application problems which get tricky but he gives you everything you need to be prepared. And take it over summer if you can because he is much more lenient. He loves teaching and tries very hard to make sure his students understand everything.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
LIFESCI 2
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: A
Aug. 18, 2016

Oh Esdin, the man I love and hate. Took LS 2 with him one year ago and ended up with C-, seriously the hardest class and the worst grade I have ever had. And here I am, sitting in his LS2 class again and surprised about how much his lecturing styles has changed. A decent lecturer as always, he now applies a strategy called "flipped classroom" and asks us to watch lecture videos at home. During normal lectures he goes over those concepts by having us discuss with neighbors and answer clicker questions. He no longer requires us to memorize all the info on slides (he even provides figures from slides on exams!) but encourages us to understand those concepts from real-life applications. His exams are way easier than those I took last year, the average of midterm last year was 70% and now it is 84%. And he even gives out extra credits if you give any feedback on his video lectures (which bumped my grade from A- to A).
TL;DR: Take Esdin for LS2, especially during summer sessions lol.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
27 of 47
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!