Guang Cheng
Department of Statistics
AD
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
  • Tough Tests
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
May 20, 2023

Guang Cheng is not a good professor. But, he is pretty clear when teaching straightforward and easy concepts in weeks 1-4, however, he fails to teach the second half (pdfs, cdfs) well because he explains none of the notation to students and expects them to follow along.

Outside of that, there are some serious problems with his course structuring. He teaches the first four weeks extremely slowly, and I would say that the content at this time is not difficult and should be taught in 3 weeks. The midterm is also torturously easy, with the mean and median both being above a 90. Then, he rushes through the significantly harder and more applicable content in the second half of the quarter. With my class, he rushed through variance, covariance, and MGFs in the last three lectures before the final. Additionally, he was out of school, leaving the quiet and unengaging TA to teach expectation within a week (two lectures). In the end, his final exam was so difficult that the average was like a 50 and he didn't curve it. I scored in the upper quartile and ended with a 65 or something like that. In the end, even though I was in the upper quartile for both the midterm and the final, I ended the class with a B, which felt really bad because I put in a lot of work and also did significantly better than my peers but got a grade that didn't reflect that.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: P
May 30, 2023

Professor Cheng does not care about his students. DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER OPTION. The professor hands out SELECTIVE grade bumps, does not respond to emails, and requires department intervention to be forced to communicate with his students.

His lectures are extremely theoretical, and don't help with understanding the homework. His final average was 54% with no curve, and no explanation. Seriously, do NOT take his class.

He claims to be a "busy" professor and that's why he can't communicate with his students. He refuses to set up an appointment unless it is weeks in advance. Very unprofessional.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
May 20, 2023

Guang Cheng is not a good professor. But, he is pretty clear when teaching straightforward and easy concepts in weeks 1-4, however, he fails to teach the second half (pdfs, cdfs) well because he explains none of the notation to students and expects them to follow along.

Outside of that, there are some serious problems with his course structuring. He teaches the first four weeks extremely slowly, and I would say that the content at this time is not difficult and should be taught in 3 weeks. The midterm is also torturously easy, with the mean and median both being above a 90. Then, he rushes through the significantly harder and more applicable content in the second half of the quarter. With my class, he rushed through variance, covariance, and MGFs in the last three lectures before the final. Additionally, he was out of school, leaving the quiet and unengaging TA to teach expectation within a week (two lectures). In the end, his final exam was so difficult that the average was like a 50 and he didn't curve it. I scored in the upper quartile and ended with a 65 or something like that. In the end, even though I was in the upper quartile for both the midterm and the final, I ended the class with a B, which felt really bad because I put in a lot of work and also did significantly better than my peers but got a grade that didn't reflect that.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: P
May 30, 2023

Professor Cheng does not care about his students. DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER OPTION. The professor hands out SELECTIVE grade bumps, does not respond to emails, and requires department intervention to be forced to communicate with his students.

His lectures are extremely theoretical, and don't help with understanding the homework. His final average was 54% with no curve, and no explanation. Seriously, do NOT take his class.

He claims to be a "busy" professor and that's why he can't communicate with his students. He refuses to set up an appointment unless it is weeks in advance. Very unprofessional.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
    (2)
  • Tough Tests
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!