- Home
- Search
- Giuseppina Silvestri
- All Reviews
Giuseppina Silvestri
AD
Based on 98 Users
This was a really interesting and somewhat easy class though the professor doesn't actually give the lectures. She posts recorded ones given by other professors (totaling to a few hours per week) and also shares related materials and case studies. There's homework almost every week, two essays with a required word count, a midterm, and a final. For the essays, you might need to put spaces between characters to increase your word count because entire sentences in some languages may only count as one word. They're graded pretty easily, and she provides a sample essay and a rubric. The homework and final had a few mistakes where some answers were repeated, and I don't know how she handled that. She didn't allow late homework submissions, but the homework is available for a week. It was on CCLE, so you could go back after the deadline and see what you got wrong. The midterm and final were proctored on Respondus, and you could use scratch paper. Some important tables were given to you, and most of the questions focused on heavily covered topics. But some asked about very specific, barely covered topics, or the answer was verbatim to something very specific in a lecture. You don't need to read the textbook or go to discussion, but those could clarify some things.
I really like Professor Giuseppina as a person, but it was often hard for me to digest lecture content. I think it depends on how well you grasp the information in the beginning, because it’s fast paced. Lecture is also at 8 AM which is not the best. The TAs are great though and provide really good worksheets to help out. My advice is do her practice set she gives about a week before the midterm & final, they are almost exactly like the tests. However, some concepts just did not make sense to me when explained during lecture
Dr. Silvestri runs the class, but Harold Torrance teaches the online lectures. The lectures were quite interesting, and I had no problem listening on 2x speed and understanding everything. The modules came with lots of interesting supplementary documentaries and videos to boost understanding and engage me when I was interested in a particular topic. This is a great, simple intro to linguistics and I would definitely recommend taking before LING 20 if you don't get it in fall quarter, as it will give you a major head start and isn't a huge pain in terms of workload.
I took it async and it is pretty easy. I only got an A- because I flopped on some of the weekly quizzes. (there are weekly quizzes, a midterm essay, final essay, and a lockdown browser midterm and lockdown browser final). The topic is interesting IMO.
Lectures were kinda boring but the workload was manageable. I would suggest to take this class if you want a easy Ling Upper Div. There is no final or midterms just quizzes throughout the quarter that are open note. There is a final paper with a presentation but she is helpful and guides you through it if you have any questions.
This class was supposed to be an easy GE class, but it was not for me because of the TA!!! Such a harsh, mean, and unsupportive TA made my class experience much more difficult and worse overall. Arjun was not a great TA, and his section was boring. However, the lecture videos were highly informative, and the contents were interesting. As an asynchronous class, all your experience will depend on the TA, so make sure you choose a good one. I would recommend this class if you are interested in linguistics, but if you’re not, don’t waste the time here. Most importantly, I hope you have a better TA than I did.
I took this class as a GE, and was super glad I did! Aside from being incredibly easy, the content of the class was also pretty interesting to me.
The structure of the class is based on 10 modules that correspond to the 10 weeks of class. Each week, you're assigned around 30 pages of textbook reading, 2-3 ~60 minute recorded lectures, and a ~15 question open-note, open-internet quiz, all of which you complete at your own pace. The lectures were given by Professor Harold Torrence, and were often longer than they need to be (you can watch them on 2x speed if you prefer) but generally pretty interesting. The content was so short that most weeks I started the content on Monday and finished the quiz by Tuesday.
Aside from the weekly quizzes, your grade is also based on two analysis papers, a midterm and a final. Both analysis papers involve analyzing the speech of a public figure (celebrity, YouTuber, politician, etc.) according to certain linguistic features they display, such as their grammar, pronunciation, accent, etc. The rubrics for these papers are INCREDIBLY SPECIFIC, which is super helpful, since as long as you mention each point Silvestri wants, you're basically guaranteed an A! In my opinion, the hardest part of both essays was finding the proper person to analyze. After that, the essays wrote themselves.
The midterm and final were both fairly easy. I found them to be about the same difficulty as the weekly quizzes, although these ones are both administered through Respondus lockdown browser, so keep that in mind.
The hardest part of this course was easily the unit on phonetics, which requires you to memorize some basic English IPA symbols and the specific classifications they fall under. The syntax and morphology units were also a little denser than most, but generally easier than phonetics. Aside from those units, everything else was super light, mostly self-explanatory, and actually really fascinating to me. Would recommend.
This was a really interesting and somewhat easy class though the professor doesn't actually give the lectures. She posts recorded ones given by other professors (totaling to a few hours per week) and also shares related materials and case studies. There's homework almost every week, two essays with a required word count, a midterm, and a final. For the essays, you might need to put spaces between characters to increase your word count because entire sentences in some languages may only count as one word. They're graded pretty easily, and she provides a sample essay and a rubric. The homework and final had a few mistakes where some answers were repeated, and I don't know how she handled that. She didn't allow late homework submissions, but the homework is available for a week. It was on CCLE, so you could go back after the deadline and see what you got wrong. The midterm and final were proctored on Respondus, and you could use scratch paper. Some important tables were given to you, and most of the questions focused on heavily covered topics. But some asked about very specific, barely covered topics, or the answer was verbatim to something very specific in a lecture. You don't need to read the textbook or go to discussion, but those could clarify some things.
I really like Professor Giuseppina as a person, but it was often hard for me to digest lecture content. I think it depends on how well you grasp the information in the beginning, because it’s fast paced. Lecture is also at 8 AM which is not the best. The TAs are great though and provide really good worksheets to help out. My advice is do her practice set she gives about a week before the midterm & final, they are almost exactly like the tests. However, some concepts just did not make sense to me when explained during lecture
Dr. Silvestri runs the class, but Harold Torrance teaches the online lectures. The lectures were quite interesting, and I had no problem listening on 2x speed and understanding everything. The modules came with lots of interesting supplementary documentaries and videos to boost understanding and engage me when I was interested in a particular topic. This is a great, simple intro to linguistics and I would definitely recommend taking before LING 20 if you don't get it in fall quarter, as it will give you a major head start and isn't a huge pain in terms of workload.
I took it async and it is pretty easy. I only got an A- because I flopped on some of the weekly quizzes. (there are weekly quizzes, a midterm essay, final essay, and a lockdown browser midterm and lockdown browser final). The topic is interesting IMO.
Lectures were kinda boring but the workload was manageable. I would suggest to take this class if you want a easy Ling Upper Div. There is no final or midterms just quizzes throughout the quarter that are open note. There is a final paper with a presentation but she is helpful and guides you through it if you have any questions.
This class was supposed to be an easy GE class, but it was not for me because of the TA!!! Such a harsh, mean, and unsupportive TA made my class experience much more difficult and worse overall. Arjun was not a great TA, and his section was boring. However, the lecture videos were highly informative, and the contents were interesting. As an asynchronous class, all your experience will depend on the TA, so make sure you choose a good one. I would recommend this class if you are interested in linguistics, but if you’re not, don’t waste the time here. Most importantly, I hope you have a better TA than I did.
I took this class as a GE, and was super glad I did! Aside from being incredibly easy, the content of the class was also pretty interesting to me.
The structure of the class is based on 10 modules that correspond to the 10 weeks of class. Each week, you're assigned around 30 pages of textbook reading, 2-3 ~60 minute recorded lectures, and a ~15 question open-note, open-internet quiz, all of which you complete at your own pace. The lectures were given by Professor Harold Torrence, and were often longer than they need to be (you can watch them on 2x speed if you prefer) but generally pretty interesting. The content was so short that most weeks I started the content on Monday and finished the quiz by Tuesday.
Aside from the weekly quizzes, your grade is also based on two analysis papers, a midterm and a final. Both analysis papers involve analyzing the speech of a public figure (celebrity, YouTuber, politician, etc.) according to certain linguistic features they display, such as their grammar, pronunciation, accent, etc. The rubrics for these papers are INCREDIBLY SPECIFIC, which is super helpful, since as long as you mention each point Silvestri wants, you're basically guaranteed an A! In my opinion, the hardest part of both essays was finding the proper person to analyze. After that, the essays wrote themselves.
The midterm and final were both fairly easy. I found them to be about the same difficulty as the weekly quizzes, although these ones are both administered through Respondus lockdown browser, so keep that in mind.
The hardest part of this course was easily the unit on phonetics, which requires you to memorize some basic English IPA symbols and the specific classifications they fall under. The syntax and morphology units were also a little denser than most, but generally easier than phonetics. Aside from those units, everything else was super light, mostly self-explanatory, and actually really fascinating to me. Would recommend.