Damon Woods
Department of Southeast Asian
AD
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
62.5%
52.1%
41.7%
31.3%
20.8%
10.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 17, 2007

the class is really interesting, if you're into S.E.A. he's from the phillipines with a filipina wife, so sometimes he forgets what country he's referring himself to (because he identifies himself as an american and filipino) and refers to both. just bring it up, and he'll correct himself.

the class was pretty good. i turned in my paper late so i got a B in the class. it's relatively easy, but so interesting! you gotta be into the subject though, or you're be bored. i wish he taught more upp div seasian classes, but then i would have to wish for more seasian classes in general. the downside to small departments, i guess.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 23, 2006

Prof. Woods is an amazing lecturer. He really makes you think and question things that perhaps we take for granted such as modernity, human rights, nationalism, perceptions of different cultures, and ethnocentricity...things like that. The point is you personally get something out of this class, even if you aren't that interested in Southeast Asian history and culture. Of course, it can't hurt if you do have an interest or curiousity about the society with respect to religion. Very interesting material. Readings are not too bad and he assigns a fair amount. The midterm (short answer terms and an essay) is more based on mainly the lecture notes while the final (short answer terms and 2 essays) is more from lecture and readings. He assigns three to four 250 word response to the readings (he'll be open and allow you to choose whichever one you find interesting most of the time) This class was easier if you do the readings, but a big chunk is from lecture so go to his lectures. But in all honesty, you'll want to come to lecture. Overall, his class is interesting and he has a perspective that is different and I believe tries to be as fair as possible. He's a really nice guy and really down to earth.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 17, 2007

the class is really interesting, if you're into S.E.A. he's from the phillipines with a filipina wife, so sometimes he forgets what country he's referring himself to (because he identifies himself as an american and filipino) and refers to both. just bring it up, and he'll correct himself.

the class was pretty good. i turned in my paper late so i got a B in the class. it's relatively easy, but so interesting! you gotta be into the subject though, or you're be bored. i wish he taught more upp div seasian classes, but then i would have to wish for more seasian classes in general. the downside to small departments, i guess.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 23, 2006

Prof. Woods is an amazing lecturer. He really makes you think and question things that perhaps we take for granted such as modernity, human rights, nationalism, perceptions of different cultures, and ethnocentricity...things like that. The point is you personally get something out of this class, even if you aren't that interested in Southeast Asian history and culture. Of course, it can't hurt if you do have an interest or curiousity about the society with respect to religion. Very interesting material. Readings are not too bad and he assigns a fair amount. The midterm (short answer terms and an essay) is more based on mainly the lecture notes while the final (short answer terms and 2 essays) is more from lecture and readings. He assigns three to four 250 word response to the readings (he'll be open and allow you to choose whichever one you find interesting most of the time) This class was easier if you do the readings, but a big chunk is from lecture so go to his lectures. But in all honesty, you'll want to come to lecture. Overall, his class is interesting and he has a perspective that is different and I believe tries to be as fair as possible. He's a really nice guy and really down to earth.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!