Christopher J Throop
Department of Anthropology
AD
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Participation Matters
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
30.5%
25.4%
20.4%
15.3%
10.2%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: N/A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Nov. 10, 2025

Probably wouldn't take this class again. I would only recommend if you enjoy philosophy. The lectures are pretty intense, minimal information on the slides except for definitions of words and the slides are not posted. He is a pretty monotonous, boring speaker and goes on MANY tangents so you have to stay on your toes to make sure you're getting what's relevant. Readings are mandatory but minimally relevant. Textbooks are sometimes referenced in class but articles and other readings were rarely, if ever talked about. Section participation is 20% with weekly discussion questions submitted on the readings which are then discussed in section. Throop is pretty egotistical and loves to talk about his personal experiences in his 2 year field study in micronesia, although this class is supposed to introduce us to cultures and societies around the world, i now consider myself an expert in the culture of Yap, an island in micronesia. A solid portion of his lectures is him trauma dumping his past experiences or reliving his glory days. He had two writing assignments for this class, both were intensely vague in the prompt and left everyone slightly confused. at the very least, his exams are relatively easy! they pull a lot from the few slides he creates and from the readings. lots of "what was the authors position/main message/background in their piece ..." and simple definition questions, very little application of concepts. if you take notes and fill out the study guide you should be fine.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: N/A
Nov. 10, 2025

Probably wouldn't take this class again. I would only recommend if you enjoy philosophy. The lectures are pretty intense, minimal information on the slides except for definitions of words and the slides are not posted. He is a pretty monotonous, boring speaker and goes on MANY tangents so you have to stay on your toes to make sure you're getting what's relevant. Readings are mandatory but minimally relevant. Textbooks are sometimes referenced in class but articles and other readings were rarely, if ever talked about. Section participation is 20% with weekly discussion questions submitted on the readings which are then discussed in section. Throop is pretty egotistical and loves to talk about his personal experiences in his 2 year field study in micronesia, although this class is supposed to introduce us to cultures and societies around the world, i now consider myself an expert in the culture of Yap, an island in micronesia. A solid portion of his lectures is him trauma dumping his past experiences or reliving his glory days. He had two writing assignments for this class, both were intensely vague in the prompt and left everyone slightly confused. at the very least, his exams are relatively easy! they pull a lot from the few slides he creates and from the readings. lots of "what was the authors position/main message/background in their piece ..." and simple definition questions, very little application of concepts. if you take notes and fill out the study guide you should be fine.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Participation Matters
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!