Chelsea M Stiekman
Department of Geography
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
67.1%
55.9%
44.7%
33.6%
22.4%
11.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Feb. 8, 2024

What a great class! The coolest subject matter and very interesting lectures. Professor Stiekman cares about her students, and has so much knowledge and experience to share with them! The tests are of moderate difficulty and there is a hypothetical grant proposal project due at the end of the quarter, so expect a little work, but it is never excessive. This is a super dope class for any physical geography students or EEB people.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 5, 2024

Professor Stiekman is a great professor who cares about the learning of her students a lot. This class is actually cross-listed with the EEB department as a note (EEB 131). While there is a lot of material gone over the class, Stiekman was very fair with grading scale and slides were very easy to follow. The grade breakdown:

Final Paper (30%) - You had to construct a 4-5 page research paper on the topic of your choice. Grading was pretty fair and I think if you followed the rubric and completed the requirements, you probably did well on the paper.

Midterm (30%)- Honestly, pretty decent overall mainly multiple choice. You were expected to know a lot of content but the exam questions were to the point and not tricky.

Final (30%)- Same deal with the midterm. Questions were to the point and no tricks but definitely required some memorization skills. Average was over 90% I believe as a reference point!

Attendance/ Participation(10%): I could be wrong but for us I think there was only one grade for this category. During Week 9, we had to attend a botanical garden tour which was nice and informative. You got points if you submitted something you found interesting.

Overall, this is my second class with Professor Stiekman and I am have been happy with both times I have taken her. She is very nice and cares for her students success. Exams are very fair and as long as you put in some work you will be fine!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Feb. 8, 2024

What a great class! The coolest subject matter and very interesting lectures. Professor Stiekman cares about her students, and has so much knowledge and experience to share with them! The tests are of moderate difficulty and there is a hypothetical grant proposal project due at the end of the quarter, so expect a little work, but it is never excessive. This is a super dope class for any physical geography students or EEB people.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 5, 2024

Professor Stiekman is a great professor who cares about the learning of her students a lot. This class is actually cross-listed with the EEB department as a note (EEB 131). While there is a lot of material gone over the class, Stiekman was very fair with grading scale and slides were very easy to follow. The grade breakdown:

Final Paper (30%) - You had to construct a 4-5 page research paper on the topic of your choice. Grading was pretty fair and I think if you followed the rubric and completed the requirements, you probably did well on the paper.

Midterm (30%)- Honestly, pretty decent overall mainly multiple choice. You were expected to know a lot of content but the exam questions were to the point and not tricky.

Final (30%)- Same deal with the midterm. Questions were to the point and no tricks but definitely required some memorization skills. Average was over 90% I believe as a reference point!

Attendance/ Participation(10%): I could be wrong but for us I think there was only one grade for this category. During Week 9, we had to attend a botanical garden tour which was nice and informative. You got points if you submitted something you found interesting.

Overall, this is my second class with Professor Stiekman and I am have been happy with both times I have taken her. She is very nice and cares for her students success. Exams are very fair and as long as you put in some work you will be fine!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!