Atsushi Austin Nakano
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.1 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
34.9%
29.1%
23.3%
17.5%
11.6%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.8%
28.2%
22.5%
16.9%
11.3%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

41.9%
34.9%
28.0%
21.0%
14.0%
7.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

40.0%
33.3%
26.7%
20.0%
13.3%
6.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: B
Aug. 31, 2016

Honestly, he is one of the worst professor I had in UCLA.
I have 3Bs in UCLA. This was the last quarter before summer session and I took 4 classes.
But this class was very last class and I knew how to study for science courses and I didn't really worry about this course on the first place. My thought towards this class was wrong.
Regardless how much effort you put into this class, you can't really prepare for the exam.
His previous exams do not help at all. You can't really prepare for his exam because he doesn't explain anything deep. Also, he brings new type of question that you were never exposed to. As a result, you can't really prepare in terms of exam question.
Studying lecture material is just good enough to answer first simple multiple choices regarding lectures. Also, his poor exam system separates A and B students.
Since most questions were multiple choice and there were problems meant to get wrong, students had to choose the answer without any educational guess and people who were lucky got A.

I got A or A- for all mcdb classes. Maybe, he wasn't right professor for me.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: N/A
June 19, 2019

Probably one of the most boring classes I’ve taken in my time at UCLA. On a personal level the professor is really nice and is a great researcher but for the class he probably should not teach because he seems to have no desire at all. Gives very minimal effort to teach with lectures disorganized and office hours a waste of time. Walking away doing well I can say it is an easy class to get through and do well in but for those wanting to get their moneys worth for education with their time at UCLA take someone else.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2014

Really nice guy. One of those professors not out to get you since he does have a nice grading curve. But be aware that even though his curve is nice doesn't mean you don't have to study for this class. I thought his tests were hard, most people did and a lot of people studied pretty hard for his tests. But because everyone studied the averages were high. The final had a 75% median and one one person got the high of 91%. That means 50% of the class fell between those scores and about 35% of those (I think) got an A so you really have to do well on the tests anyway because I got 85% on one midterm and my friend who got an 81% test score on that midterm was ranked 15% lower among the class. Nonetheless, he's still a much better professor with regards to grading than I've heard of the other mcdb 144 professor. Good luck!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: B
Aug. 31, 2016

Honestly, he is one of the worst professor I had in UCLA.
I have 3Bs in UCLA. This was the last quarter before summer session and I took 4 classes.
But this class was very last class and I knew how to study for science courses and I didn't really worry about this course on the first place. My thought towards this class was wrong.
Regardless how much effort you put into this class, you can't really prepare for the exam.
His previous exams do not help at all. You can't really prepare for his exam because he doesn't explain anything deep. Also, he brings new type of question that you were never exposed to. As a result, you can't really prepare in terms of exam question.
Studying lecture material is just good enough to answer first simple multiple choices regarding lectures. Also, his poor exam system separates A and B students.
Since most questions were multiple choice and there were problems meant to get wrong, students had to choose the answer without any educational guess and people who were lucky got A.

I got A or A- for all mcdb classes. Maybe, he wasn't right professor for me.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: N/A
June 19, 2019

Probably one of the most boring classes I’ve taken in my time at UCLA. On a personal level the professor is really nice and is a great researcher but for the class he probably should not teach because he seems to have no desire at all. Gives very minimal effort to teach with lectures disorganized and office hours a waste of time. Walking away doing well I can say it is an easy class to get through and do well in but for those wanting to get their moneys worth for education with their time at UCLA take someone else.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2014

Really nice guy. One of those professors not out to get you since he does have a nice grading curve. But be aware that even though his curve is nice doesn't mean you don't have to study for this class. I thought his tests were hard, most people did and a lot of people studied pretty hard for his tests. But because everyone studied the averages were high. The final had a 75% median and one one person got the high of 91%. That means 50% of the class fell between those scores and about 35% of those (I think) got an A so you really have to do well on the tests anyway because I got 85% on one midterm and my friend who got an 81% test score on that midterm was ranked 15% lower among the class. Nonetheless, he's still a much better professor with regards to grading than I've heard of the other mcdb 144 professor. Good luck!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.1 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!