Anthony R Friscia
Department of General Education Clusters
AD
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
60.8%
50.7%
40.5%
30.4%
20.3%
10.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.7%
32.2%
25.8%
19.3%
12.9%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

49.2%
41.0%
32.8%
24.6%
16.4%
8.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

54.8%
45.6%
36.5%
27.4%
18.3%
9.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.5%
27.1%
21.7%
16.3%
10.8%
5.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.9%
27.4%
21.9%
16.4%
11.0%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.4%
28.7%
23.0%
17.2%
11.5%
5.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A+
Sept. 14, 2022

For the 70CW seminar, I took Science and Society (seminar 6) with Amanda Klinger. Amanda was SUCH A QUEEN we all loved her. This seminar was so eye-opening and so interesting. It shows the real-world societal problems and interactions between the histories of society and science (including how they evolved together). This class was beyond chill -- Amanda literally let us grade ourselves on everything -- even the final project.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 3, 2009

Tony's definitely different in the seminar and than in lecture. It's true that you get to know him better in a smaller setting, and he's a really cool guy. The class had a ton of reading compared to the other seminars but it was totally worth it because we had a really dynamic class with good discussions which allowed us to learn a lot about Darwin. As for the first two quarters in the cluster, he's a pretty good lecturer. The only thing that bothers me is that he tends to stare at the ground while he talks, which is distracting. And it's really obvious how hard he works for the class organizing everything and really trying to get to know the students. He can be a harsh grader when it comes to essays, but that's not a real problem if you go to him for extra help. I would definitely recommend the Cosmos cluster, it really defined my freshman year.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A+
Sept. 14, 2022

For the 70CW seminar, I took Science and Society (seminar 6) with Amanda Klinger. Amanda was SUCH A QUEEN we all loved her. This seminar was so eye-opening and so interesting. It shows the real-world societal problems and interactions between the histories of society and science (including how they evolved together). This class was beyond chill -- Amanda literally let us grade ourselves on everything -- even the final project.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 3, 2009

Tony's definitely different in the seminar and than in lecture. It's true that you get to know him better in a smaller setting, and he's a really cool guy. The class had a ton of reading compared to the other seminars but it was totally worth it because we had a really dynamic class with good discussions which allowed us to learn a lot about Darwin. As for the first two quarters in the cluster, he's a pretty good lecturer. The only thing that bothers me is that he tends to stare at the ground while he talks, which is distracting. And it's really obvious how hard he works for the class organizing everything and really trying to get to know the students. He can be a harsh grader when it comes to essays, but that's not a real problem if you go to him for extra help. I would definitely recommend the Cosmos cluster, it really defined my freshman year.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Often Funny
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!