Ankur Mehta
Department of Electrical Engineering
AD
1.9
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 1.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Tough Tests
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Issues PTEs
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.8%
18.1%
14.5%
10.9%
7.3%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (10)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: F
Nov. 5, 2019

The worst nightmare ever at UCLA

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
March 27, 2019

This was Mehta's first time teaching this class, so I may cut him some slack, but oh boy this class was a roller coaster.

The homeworks were hard, honestly working in a group was the only way to make sure you got all of it done. The questions on the midterm/final were similar in thought process.

The exams were so long. I didn't have enough time to finish either the midterm or the final. I got a 35/65 on the final and I'm pretty sure that was a bit above the median, since I got a B+ in the class without finishing the project.

The project was insanely difficult. There wasn't much introduction to Verilog and I had no idea how to debug anything. I straight up was not able to finish like two functions on the second project. This class was so stressful.

He lectures fine, and it's nice to see a professor who still has enthusiasm. Fun fact: He was on Beauty and the Geek, some MTV show back when he was at MIT.

Do I recommend this class? No. While Mehta aspired to teach a class at par with the equivalent at MIT, he severely overestimated the capabilities of his students. This class required a huge amount of time. He's a nice dude, but maybe take this class after he chills out in terms of the material/pace of the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B
March 2, 2019

To be honest, EEM16 was a hilariously bad class. The homeworks were very difficult and the midterms were too, but the content of the class and the pre lecture videos had little to no overlap. His lectures are not very useful and he often goes off on long tangents. Avoid this professor if you cab

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: N/A
July 20, 2018

Overall I would say this is a decent class. It's not easy - lectures are pretty packed with information but hes a clear lecture and has you watch relevant MIT lecture videos beforehand, which lets him go into more detail.
Homework and labs were tough. You absolutely have to start early on the homework because you'll have to go to office hours at least once to get some guidance or clarification on certain questions.
He gives you seven grace days that can be used in any way throughout the quarter which is nice but the class is structured so that you need to start each homework/lab right after turning in the previous one so you have to be careful not to fall too hard behind.
The labs essentially consist of using verilog to implement the modules designed in the previous homework (problem set). Meaning if your homework answers weren't right, you probably won't have a good time with the lab. He does release homework solutions but only a week after the homework is due (because of his grace days policy) and by then the lab is already due. The experience with verilog definitely helped in later classes (M152A) but he doesn't give enough tutorial into how to use it before you have to start your labs. You definitely learn a lot from the homework and labs but the pacing might be too much for a 10 week class.
The midterm was hard, final even harder. I wouldn't be surprised if the average for the final was around 25% (absolutely) insane curve. At least no one else knows what they're doing either.
You come out of this class having learned a lot, but it would be better if the assignments/tests and pacing didn't have a "boot camp-y", make it or break it feel to it. Would definitely take it over M151A, though.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: P
June 22, 2018

This class made me hate electrical engineering along with that Verilog thing, this class was the motivation to change my major. I would rather take the actual MIT 6004 and have some super tough exams but not this class because I was misled, I thought I was really not gonna need the textbook, I would have been better off if I hadn't listened to him and just read the textbook instead of going to his classes.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
June 16, 2018

the projects were really time consuming and difficult, but ultimately really satisfying and i left the class feeling like i truly learned the material. the final was ridiculously difficult tho, a kid literally was taken out by paramedics and we just kept going like nothing happened.
pretty interesting lectures as well imo, although he sometimes goes on tangents. he goes on tangents in office hours as well. he's extremely knowledgable about the entire process from manufacturing circuits to engineering design.
if you want a challenge and something interesting, i would recommend him.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: F
May 19, 2018

Don't take this class. You will waste your time and lower your GPA.

Professor overly complicates concepts and gives ridiculous exams. The median on the first midterm was about a 25%. The final was so hard that one student got a seizure and paramedics had to come in.

Advice: Either take CS M51A or wait another quarter. I wish someone had told me this before I took his class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: C
May 13, 2018

The dictionary definition of a SCUMBAG. Sky high expectations, little to no guidance or at least clarifications of instructions, time-consuming assignments, boring lectures. And don't even get me started on the tests...his final physically, LITERALLY PHYSICALLY, broke a student. And guess what? He didn't give two DAMN shits, life moved on for him just like that. Avoid like AIDS. This man, or the SHELL of a man, should NEVER be allowed near students ever again. Ever since the presidential election, I never thought I would hate a professor as much as I hate Donald Trump I guess I've been proven wrong. Shame on you EE department for the way you clowns hire professors! You guys are like the GOP right now: no balls, no shame, bad judgment!!!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
May 13, 2018

Test difficulty: A student had a mental breakdown in his final.
Project difficulty: I am now completely allergic to Verilog.
Recommend: no, emphasize on no

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B+
April 14, 2018

Mehta has a knack for complicating things that are simple. From his homework to his tests to his labs, it was very hard to make sense of anything. His examples during lecture don't make very much sense, and he doesn't give us any resources to adapt to his question-making style. This class was the most painful and time-consuming class I've taken at UCLA.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: F
Nov. 5, 2019

The worst nightmare ever at UCLA

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B+
March 27, 2019

This was Mehta's first time teaching this class, so I may cut him some slack, but oh boy this class was a roller coaster.

The homeworks were hard, honestly working in a group was the only way to make sure you got all of it done. The questions on the midterm/final were similar in thought process.

The exams were so long. I didn't have enough time to finish either the midterm or the final. I got a 35/65 on the final and I'm pretty sure that was a bit above the median, since I got a B+ in the class without finishing the project.

The project was insanely difficult. There wasn't much introduction to Verilog and I had no idea how to debug anything. I straight up was not able to finish like two functions on the second project. This class was so stressful.

He lectures fine, and it's nice to see a professor who still has enthusiasm. Fun fact: He was on Beauty and the Geek, some MTV show back when he was at MIT.

Do I recommend this class? No. While Mehta aspired to teach a class at par with the equivalent at MIT, he severely overestimated the capabilities of his students. This class required a huge amount of time. He's a nice dude, but maybe take this class after he chills out in terms of the material/pace of the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B
March 2, 2019

To be honest, EEM16 was a hilariously bad class. The homeworks were very difficult and the midterms were too, but the content of the class and the pre lecture videos had little to no overlap. His lectures are not very useful and he often goes off on long tangents. Avoid this professor if you cab

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: N/A
July 20, 2018

Overall I would say this is a decent class. It's not easy - lectures are pretty packed with information but hes a clear lecture and has you watch relevant MIT lecture videos beforehand, which lets him go into more detail.
Homework and labs were tough. You absolutely have to start early on the homework because you'll have to go to office hours at least once to get some guidance or clarification on certain questions.
He gives you seven grace days that can be used in any way throughout the quarter which is nice but the class is structured so that you need to start each homework/lab right after turning in the previous one so you have to be careful not to fall too hard behind.
The labs essentially consist of using verilog to implement the modules designed in the previous homework (problem set). Meaning if your homework answers weren't right, you probably won't have a good time with the lab. He does release homework solutions but only a week after the homework is due (because of his grace days policy) and by then the lab is already due. The experience with verilog definitely helped in later classes (M152A) but he doesn't give enough tutorial into how to use it before you have to start your labs. You definitely learn a lot from the homework and labs but the pacing might be too much for a 10 week class.
The midterm was hard, final even harder. I wouldn't be surprised if the average for the final was around 25% (absolutely) insane curve. At least no one else knows what they're doing either.
You come out of this class having learned a lot, but it would be better if the assignments/tests and pacing didn't have a "boot camp-y", make it or break it feel to it. Would definitely take it over M151A, though.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: P
June 22, 2018

This class made me hate electrical engineering along with that Verilog thing, this class was the motivation to change my major. I would rather take the actual MIT 6004 and have some super tough exams but not this class because I was misled, I thought I was really not gonna need the textbook, I would have been better off if I hadn't listened to him and just read the textbook instead of going to his classes.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
June 16, 2018

the projects were really time consuming and difficult, but ultimately really satisfying and i left the class feeling like i truly learned the material. the final was ridiculously difficult tho, a kid literally was taken out by paramedics and we just kept going like nothing happened.
pretty interesting lectures as well imo, although he sometimes goes on tangents. he goes on tangents in office hours as well. he's extremely knowledgable about the entire process from manufacturing circuits to engineering design.
if you want a challenge and something interesting, i would recommend him.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: F
May 19, 2018

Don't take this class. You will waste your time and lower your GPA.

Professor overly complicates concepts and gives ridiculous exams. The median on the first midterm was about a 25%. The final was so hard that one student got a seizure and paramedics had to come in.

Advice: Either take CS M51A or wait another quarter. I wish someone had told me this before I took his class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: C
May 13, 2018

The dictionary definition of a SCUMBAG. Sky high expectations, little to no guidance or at least clarifications of instructions, time-consuming assignments, boring lectures. And don't even get me started on the tests...his final physically, LITERALLY PHYSICALLY, broke a student. And guess what? He didn't give two DAMN shits, life moved on for him just like that. Avoid like AIDS. This man, or the SHELL of a man, should NEVER be allowed near students ever again. Ever since the presidential election, I never thought I would hate a professor as much as I hate Donald Trump I guess I've been proven wrong. Shame on you EE department for the way you clowns hire professors! You guys are like the GOP right now: no balls, no shame, bad judgment!!!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B
May 13, 2018

Test difficulty: A student had a mental breakdown in his final.
Project difficulty: I am now completely allergic to Verilog.
Recommend: no, emphasize on no

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: B+
April 14, 2018

Mehta has a knack for complicating things that are simple. From his homework to his tests to his labs, it was very hard to make sense of anything. His examples during lecture don't make very much sense, and he doesn't give us any resources to adapt to his question-making style. This class was the most painful and time-consuming class I've taken at UCLA.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.9
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 1.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (4)
  • Tough Tests
    (4)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (2)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
  • Issues PTEs
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!