Amir R Alexander
Department of History
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
40.7%
34.0%
27.2%
20.4%
13.6%
6.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 30, 2025

The content for this class is fine; I was not personally too interested in the history of mathematics, but it was a change of pace from other history courses, which is nice. However, Professor Alexander usually just read off his slides the entire lecture, leading to most of the class being pretty boring. At the same time, attendance was mandatory for lectures.
The biggest issue for me, however, lied in the grading. We had weekly reading responses, which in my opinion were quite easy. However, no matter how well they were written and how much textual evidence was used, the entire class seemed to get a 94. These grades for the reading responses left far less leeway in regards to the tests (one midterm and one final) for those who wanted to keep an A. I got lucky and managed to keep an A in the class, but after most people averaged around a 90 on the tests, the 94 on the participation assignments most likely kept them all at A- grades. If you are fine with being in that position, while also enjoying just copying the slides down that Professor Alexander shares, then this class is fine. However, if you are looking for an A in an upper division history class, I would consider other options before taking this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
June 27, 2019

A laid back professor. He treats his students like they are in college, not like high schoolers, which I appreciated. His tests were interesting, he adds terms you choose from to add within the paper, which helps in giving clues if you happen to forget important pieces of what was taught. The readings were very interesting and every week I enjoyed what I was to learn next. I went to his office hours and he was supportive and willing to talk about school, life, career goals, etc. I suggest taking him, plus his lectures are podcasted but do not miss too many classes since this accounts for 10% participation grade.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: N/A
Feb. 12, 2018

He's a great professor. Exactly what I expect for a college environment. His lectures are informative and he goes over key points more than once, so taking notes for his class is a good experience. I really enjoy him and wish I would have taken more classes with him before my senior year. I haven't personally interacted with him but he absolutely is nice and will help you if you ask. 180A is so interesting I have actually done all the readings for the class! He deserves a much higher rating. Very solid class and professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
June 30, 2025

The content for this class is fine; I was not personally too interested in the history of mathematics, but it was a change of pace from other history courses, which is nice. However, Professor Alexander usually just read off his slides the entire lecture, leading to most of the class being pretty boring. At the same time, attendance was mandatory for lectures.
The biggest issue for me, however, lied in the grading. We had weekly reading responses, which in my opinion were quite easy. However, no matter how well they were written and how much textual evidence was used, the entire class seemed to get a 94. These grades for the reading responses left far less leeway in regards to the tests (one midterm and one final) for those who wanted to keep an A. I got lucky and managed to keep an A in the class, but after most people averaged around a 90 on the tests, the 94 on the participation assignments most likely kept them all at A- grades. If you are fine with being in that position, while also enjoying just copying the slides down that Professor Alexander shares, then this class is fine. However, if you are looking for an A in an upper division history class, I would consider other options before taking this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
June 27, 2019

A laid back professor. He treats his students like they are in college, not like high schoolers, which I appreciated. His tests were interesting, he adds terms you choose from to add within the paper, which helps in giving clues if you happen to forget important pieces of what was taught. The readings were very interesting and every week I enjoyed what I was to learn next. I went to his office hours and he was supportive and willing to talk about school, life, career goals, etc. I suggest taking him, plus his lectures are podcasted but do not miss too many classes since this accounts for 10% participation grade.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: N/A
Feb. 12, 2018

He's a great professor. Exactly what I expect for a college environment. His lectures are informative and he goes over key points more than once, so taking notes for his class is a good experience. I really enjoy him and wish I would have taken more classes with him before my senior year. I haven't personally interacted with him but he absolutely is nice and will help you if you ask. 180A is so interesting I have actually done all the readings for the class! He deserves a much higher rating. Very solid class and professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (2)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (2)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!