ENGL 129
Topics in Genre Studies, Interdisciplinary Studies, and Critical Theory
Description: Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour (when scheduled). Enforced requisites: courses 10A, 10B, 10C. Recommended: courses 120, 121. Consult Schedule of Classes for author, period, genre, or subject to be studied in specific term. Depending on instructor, emphasis may be historical, regional, national, comparative, or thematic. May be repeated for credit with topic or instructor change. P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 5.0
Units: 5.0
Last Name
- Last Name
- First Name
- Number of Ratings
- Avg. Overall
- Avg. Easiness
- Avg. Workload
- Avg. Clarity
- Avg. Helpfulness
1 of 2
AD
Most Helpful Review
Spring 2025 - Hyde is a really engaging and pleasant professor, and clearly has a lot of knowledge and insights into the readings. I really enjoyed a lot of the readings, and always felt that her feedback on my writing was productive. Her lectures could get a bit dense and sophisticated though, which sometimes made understanding the material difficult. Also, I kind of felt at times like she focused so much on the small details of the course that the bigger picture was obscured. The theme of our class was "literature and personhood," which is incredibly interesting. But I often didn't really feel like I had a cohesive understanding of how our different readings informed the central idea of the course. It's a case of missing the forest for the trees, I suppose.
Spring 2025 - Hyde is a really engaging and pleasant professor, and clearly has a lot of knowledge and insights into the readings. I really enjoyed a lot of the readings, and always felt that her feedback on my writing was productive. Her lectures could get a bit dense and sophisticated though, which sometimes made understanding the material difficult. Also, I kind of felt at times like she focused so much on the small details of the course that the bigger picture was obscured. The theme of our class was "literature and personhood," which is incredibly interesting. But I often didn't really feel like I had a cohesive understanding of how our different readings informed the central idea of the course. It's a case of missing the forest for the trees, I suppose.
AD
1 of 2
