Pari Kasliwal
Department of Economics
AD
1.3
Overall Rating
Based on 10 Users
Easiness 1.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 1, 2003

I don't think the ratings of Kasliwal are very fair. Compared to the other wacked out Econ professors I've had, he's really not bad. If you've taken previous econ classes at UCLA, you know by now the textbook is never used. Don't bother buying the book. He makes you but his own notes, which is only 20 bucks. (The textbook is 120.) The notes is basically everything that will be covered in class. It also includes some previous exams and practice questions. Do them! Very useful since he puts some of the exact same ones on finals and midterms. Office hours are okay. He makes you feel stupid but in general just ask away. Ignore his condescending tone. This class was way easy compared to my econ 11 and 101 class. It's definately a reasonable class, take it!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 1, 2003

I believe that previous reviews on him on are a little too harsh. He may be a bit ambigous, however, if the subject had been studied throughly by the student, there should be a decent understanding of the material. I did not need to kiss his ass like some people claim that they must. I did do one thing though; attended all his lectures. Overall, he is a nice teacher whose intentions, I believe, are good.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 15, 2001

Just took him for 102. What everyone has said here so far is pretty much on the mark, so you can guess that I'm gonna say don't take him if you can avoid it. But if you can't, do yourself a favor and save your money and don't buy the book.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 13, 2001

His lectures, tests, quizzes and all other outside interaction were very poorly conducted. The manner in which he chose to deliniate his information was vague and confusing as his answers differed with each interaction.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 1, 2003

I don't think the ratings of Kasliwal are very fair. Compared to the other wacked out Econ professors I've had, he's really not bad. If you've taken previous econ classes at UCLA, you know by now the textbook is never used. Don't bother buying the book. He makes you but his own notes, which is only 20 bucks. (The textbook is 120.) The notes is basically everything that will be covered in class. It also includes some previous exams and practice questions. Do them! Very useful since he puts some of the exact same ones on finals and midterms. Office hours are okay. He makes you feel stupid but in general just ask away. Ignore his condescending tone. This class was way easy compared to my econ 11 and 101 class. It's definately a reasonable class, take it!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 1, 2003

I believe that previous reviews on him on are a little too harsh. He may be a bit ambigous, however, if the subject had been studied throughly by the student, there should be a decent understanding of the material. I did not need to kiss his ass like some people claim that they must. I did do one thing though; attended all his lectures. Overall, he is a nice teacher whose intentions, I believe, are good.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 15, 2001

Just took him for 102. What everyone has said here so far is pretty much on the mark, so you can guess that I'm gonna say don't take him if you can avoid it. But if you can't, do yourself a favor and save your money and don't buy the book.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 13, 2001

His lectures, tests, quizzes and all other outside interaction were very poorly conducted. The manner in which he chose to deliniate his information was vague and confusing as his answers differed with each interaction.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.3
Overall Rating
Based on 10 Users
Easiness 1.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!