All Ratings and Reviews for Louis-Serge Bouchard

Ratings

Bad
Overall 2.7
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 1.1
Easy
Heavy
Workload 1.9
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 3.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 3.4
Helpful
AD
1 of 2

Reviews

CHEM 114, taken Winter 2017 Submitted Nov. 9, 2017 Grade Received: A+

If you are reading this, then more than likely you have heard horror stories about Bouchard and 114. And, you also probably don't have much of a choice about taking this class. But, let me address a few things.

The class is very difficult, no lies here. On top of the lab reports, Louie gives the hardest homework assignments I ever had at UCLA, and exams aren't a walk in the park (although if you study and do the hw they actually aren't all that bad). Ultimately, however, I ended up appreciating the class. Louie is very rigorous, derived, and straight forward in his lectures, and ultimately the lectures are clear. He also provides incredibly detailed notes, which are long but you MUST study them to do well. Be sure to go to the TA's to make sure your lab reports are well written, as you shouldn't lose sight of the fact that they are the biggest portion of your grade. The class is hard, and you will have to work your tail off, but Bouchard is actually a cool guy, he just enjoys challenging people.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted Nov. 1, 2017 Grade Received: A

He’s the greatest Professor I’ve taken in UCLA ever. I don’t understand why someone’s saying that he requires us to read the textbook—

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted Oct. 23, 2017 Grade Received: A-

Avoid this class at any cost. Even my chem110A is better than this class.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted Oct. 23, 2017 Grade Received: A-

Avoid this class at any cost. Even my chem110A is better than this class.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted July 3, 2017 Grade Received: A

The first day of class, he told us specifically that we would not need to use or even purchase the textbook for this class, and that the only thing we would need were his lecture notes. Unfortunately this is far from true. A few days before the midterm, he sent an email that said that he expected the students to read and understand all the material in the textbook and the lecture notes. There is also ADDITIONAL material in the homework (e.g. two page long explanations of new material for a certain question that you were required to know). There were mistakes on the solutions, which made my life so much more confusing. That's three different sources of different material. Plus actually going to lecture which sometimes he discussed material that wasn't in any of these three sources that was on the test.
He didn't discuss at all what from the material would be on the test and did not know his grading scale at all (when asked he basically just said he wouldn't know until all final grades were in). The only reason I did okay in this class was that I read all three sources of material and took ridiculously thorough notes of the textbook. I say ok because I got an A but my scores on the midterms were both C's, and I left a decent amount of the final blank. I took 4 classes and this is basically the only class I had time to study for. I knew an overwhelming amount of material including upper-div chem for this class slightly well instead of the ACTUAL information that I was SUPPOSED to know for this class very well. The midterms and final were actually not that hard in retrospect, but the averages were something like 30-50%, because he gave us so much material and people studied the wrong things/didn't know what they were supposed to study.
He is extremely condescending and will not answer your questions straight. I asked a very direct yes or no answer question to him and he kept giving roundabout answers, and lo and behold he very question I asked him was on a midterm and guess what I didn't know the fucking answer because he wouldn't help me.
I don't know what the final grade distribution for this class was, but seriously it is not worth your worry or stress with this professor I seriously aged 100 years by having him.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted June 29, 2017 Grade Received: A+

Prof Bouchard is misunderstood by the student, I'd suppose. Even though the course materials are hard, Bouchard gives fairly clear lecture about these course materials. His lecture notes posted online are very thorough. The test is very hard, but if you work through lecture notes and the problem sets posted, you will be fine. Also, prof Bouchard is really helpful and really willing to help students during his office hours, and especially outside OH. He would simply tell you to just come by his office, and he will help you with your problems. Good professor overall. But if you simply don't like Chem 20B materials, you can find other easier professors.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted June 25, 2017 Grade Received: A

Bouchard's lectures involve mostly derivations. He won't actually show you how to use the equations that he derives, nor will he explain any big conceptual ideas in chemistry/how to approach problems. You'll have to teach yourself most of the material. The only reason I did well in this class was because I had a helpful TA. Avoid this class if you can, or if you must take it, good luck.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted June 13, 2017 Grade Received: NR

This class is unnecessarily difficult. There are no study guides to help students study, and on exams a equations sheet and constants are not provided.

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted May 1, 2017 Grade Received: N/A

The average for the first midterm was a 38%... enough said

CHEM 20B, taken Spring 2017 Submitted April 26, 2017 Grade Received: N/A

wtf is this, why do we have to derive the formula for the probability of a molecule having a certain speed in the second chem class here? its harder calculus than 31A/B

1 of 2
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.