Political Economy of Development

Political Science department

Daniel Posner

Political Economy of Development

Political Science department

Daniel Posner

Add Review
from 3 users

Ratings

Bad
Overall 4.7
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 2.7
Easy
Heavy
Workload 2.7
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 5.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 4.3
Helpful
AD

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again

Grades

Spring 2016
27.0%
22.5%
18.0%
13.5%
9.0%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Spring 2014
31.5%
26.2%
21.0%
15.7%
10.5%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD
AD
1 of 1

Reviews

Quarter Taken: Spring 2017 Submitted Dec. 3, 2017 Grade Received: A

Posner is great. This class isn't as interesting as his Africa class - perhaps I just find the topic somewhat dry - but it's an important one to take. Exams are reasonable.

Quarter Taken: Spring 2017 Submitted Nov. 19, 2017 Grade Received: A

An excellent professor and lecturer, makes complex ideas easily understood. You must attend every lecture as there is a ton of information, but it is manageable

Quarter Taken: Spring 2017 Submitted June 28, 2017 Grade Received: A

Posner is an amazing professor and I'm very glad I took him. It is not an easy class - you must show up and take thorough notes. He does not podcast and the slides are just statistics and images, which won't make any sense without the context of the lecture. If you put in the work, you will learn so much.

1 of 1

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.