Ali Behdad
Department of English
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Participation Matters
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
43.8%
36.5%
29.2%
21.9%
14.6%
7.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 23, 2024

This class was very boring. Every session consisted of sitting there and watching the professor read off of a slideshow, which was always at least 70% quotes from whatever book we had to read that week. The works we read were interesting, but I did not feel like I gained any further understanding of them during the lectures. This class is also based on discussion, so there were a lot of pauses and awkward silences when the professor asked a question and no one would answer.

There are three written assignments (2 short papers and an annotated bibliography that's graded on completion) and a "fishbowl" presentation where you group up with a couple of people and talk about an assigned book in front of the class. These are the only times when I felt like I was conscious. Oh, and if you miss a class, you have to write a three-page paper to make up for it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
April 23, 2024

This class was very boring. Every session consisted of sitting there and watching the professor read off of a slideshow, which was always at least 70% quotes from whatever book we had to read that week. The works we read were interesting, but I did not feel like I gained any further understanding of them during the lectures. This class is also based on discussion, so there were a lot of pauses and awkward silences when the professor asked a question and no one would answer.

There are three written assignments (2 short papers and an annotated bibliography that's graded on completion) and a "fishbowl" presentation where you group up with a couple of people and talk about an assigned book in front of the class. These are the only times when I felt like I was conscious. Oh, and if you miss a class, you have to write a three-page paper to make up for it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!